Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/cnp: Panel Power sequence changes for CNP PCH.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> As for BXT, PP_DIVISOR was removed from CNP PCH and power
> cycle delay has been moved to PP_CONTROL.
> 
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 58dca87..1a27c72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static void intel_pps_get_registers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	regs->pp_stat = PP_STATUS(pps_idx);

We get the PPS index for BXT from bxt_power_sequencer_idx(), but I don't
see that in this patch for CNP PCH. Does that mean CNP has just one
power sequencer? 


>  	regs->pp_on = PP_ON_DELAYS(pps_idx);
>  	regs->pp_off = PP_OFF_DELAYS(pps_idx);
> -	if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> +	if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv))
>  		regs->pp_div = PP_DIVISOR(pps_idx);
>  }
>  
> @@ -5099,7 +5099,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  	pp_on = I915_READ(regs.pp_on);
>  	pp_off = I915_READ(regs.pp_off);
> -	if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> +	if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
>  		I915_WRITE(regs.pp_ctrl, pp_ctl);
>  		pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_div);
>  	}
> @@ -5117,7 +5117,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	seq->t10 = (pp_off & PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_MASK) >>
>  		   PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT;
>  
> -	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> +	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
>  		u16 tmp = (pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
>  			BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT;
>  		if (tmp > 0)
> @@ -5274,7 +5274,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		 (seq->t10 << PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT);
>  	/* Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec
>  	 * formula. */
> -	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> +	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
>  		pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl);
>  		pp_div &= ~BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK;
>  		pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP((seq->t11_t12 + 1), 1000)


I am not seeing the I915_WRITE for pp_div.


> @@ -5308,7 +5308,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("panel power sequencer register settings: PP_ON %#x, PP_OFF %#x, PP_DIV %#x\n",
>  		      I915_READ(regs.pp_on),
>  		      I915_READ(regs.pp_off),
> -		      IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) ?
> +		      (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) ?
>  		      (I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl) & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) :
>  		      I915_READ(regs.pp_div));
>  }

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux