On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> As for BXT, PP_DIVISOR was removed from CNP PCH and power
> cycle delay has been moved to PP_CONTROL.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 58dca87..1a27c72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static void intel_pps_get_registers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> regs->pp_stat = PP_STATUS(pps_idx);
We get the PPS index for BXT from bxt_power_sequencer_idx(), but I don't
see that in this patch for CNP PCH. Does that mean CNP has just one
power sequencer?
> regs->pp_on = PP_ON_DELAYS(pps_idx);
> regs->pp_off = PP_OFF_DELAYS(pps_idx);
> - if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> + if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv))
> regs->pp_div = PP_DIVISOR(pps_idx);
> }
>
> @@ -5099,7 +5099,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> pp_on = I915_READ(regs.pp_on);
> pp_off = I915_READ(regs.pp_off);
> - if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> + if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
> I915_WRITE(regs.pp_ctrl, pp_ctl);
> pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_div);
> }
> @@ -5117,7 +5117,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> seq->t10 = (pp_off & PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_MASK) >>
> PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT;
>
> - if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> + if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
> u16 tmp = (pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
> BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT;
> if (tmp > 0)
> @@ -5274,7 +5274,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> (seq->t10 << PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT);
> /* Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec
> * formula. */
> - if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> + if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
> pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl);
> pp_div &= ~BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK;
> pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP((seq->t11_t12 + 1), 1000)
I am not seeing the I915_WRITE for pp_div.
> @@ -5308,7 +5308,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("panel power sequencer register settings: PP_ON %#x, PP_OFF %#x, PP_DIV %#x\n",
> I915_READ(regs.pp_on),
> I915_READ(regs.pp_off),
> - IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) ?
> + (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) ?
> (I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl) & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) :
> I915_READ(regs.pp_div));
> }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
