On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 08:40:43PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:26:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > El Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:56:05PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit: > > > > > In several instances the driver passes an 'enum pipe' value to a > > > function expecting an 'enum transcoder' and viceversa. Since PIPE_x and > > > TRANSCODER_x have the same values this doesn't cause functional > > > problems. Still it is incorrect and causes clang to generate warnings > > > like this: > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1844:34: warning: implicit > > > conversion from enumeration type 'enum transcoder' to different > > > enumeration type 'enum pipe' [-Wenum-conversion] > > > assert_fdi_rx_enabled(dev_priv, TRANSCODER_A); > > > > > > Change the code to pass values of the type expected by the callee. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++-- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 ++++-- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 6 ++++-- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 6 ++++-- > > > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Ping, any comments on this patch? > > I'm not convinced the patch is making things any better really. To > fix this really properly, I think we'd need to introduce a new enum > pch_transcoder and thus avoid the confusion of which type of > transcoder we're talking about. Currently most places expect an > enum pipe when dealing with PCH transcoders, and enum transcoder > when dealing with CPU transcoders. But there are some exceptions > of course. enum transcoder is wrong for the pch, that enum is only for cpu transcoders introduced in hsw+. PCH should always use enum pipe. So a patch to switch the enum to enum pipe for all the pch functions sounds like the right thing to do here. Plus maybe rename enum transcoder to enum cpu_transcoder, but that'd be tons of work. A comment instead might be easier ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx