Em Seg, 2017-04-24 às 21:22 +0300, Ville Syrjälä escreveu: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:15:46PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Gen 10 should use the exact same code as Gen 9, so change the check > > to > > take this into consideration, and also assume that future platforms > > will run this code. > > > > Also add a MISSING_CASE(), just in case we do something wrong, > > instead > > of silently failing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > index 4c07b91..a2b2509 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > @@ -2291,7 +2291,7 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(const struct > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv, > > uint16_t wm[8]) > > { > > - if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv)) { > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) { > > uint32_t val; > > int ret, i; > > int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv); > > @@ -2351,7 +2351,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > } > > > > /* > > - * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl,glk > > + * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl+,glk > > When we did we start to use the '+' notation in the w/a notes? The + is because this code, when written, was going to be run for every gen >= 9. Stuff changed, rebases happened, so I guess I'll need to re- check to see that's still the case. > > What would it mean to say 'skl+,glk'? Is BXT included or not? When I originally wrote this patch, I changed from "skl" to "skl+", there was no glk, and it was added by not-me during some rebase at some point. > > > > > * > > * punit doesn't take into account the read > > latency so we need > > * to add 2us to the various latency levels we > > retrieve from the > > @@ -2390,6 +2390,8 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > wm[0] = 7; > > wm[1] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM1_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK; > > wm[2] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM2_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK; > > + } else { > > + MISSING_CASE(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv)); > > } > > } > > > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx