Why not squash this with patch 08/14? and call it cleanup for obtaining the
rate index using intel_dp_rate_index()
Just a thought..
Regards
Manasi
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:59:12PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Localize link_rate_index to the if block, and rename to just index to
> reduce indent.
>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 95f2278700e3..6f743490855b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1636,7 +1636,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> /* Conveniently, the link BW constants become indices with a shift...*/
> int min_clock = 0;
> int max_clock;
> - int link_rate_index;
> int bpp, mode_rate;
> int link_avail, link_clock;
> int common_len;
> @@ -1680,11 +1679,13 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> /* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
> if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> - link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> - intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> - if (link_rate_index >= 0)
> - min_clock = max_clock = link_rate_index;
> + int index;
> +
> + index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> + intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> + intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> + if (index >= 0)
> + min_clock = max_clock = index;
> min_lane_count = max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> }
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
> --
> 2.1.4
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
