On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 17:44 +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Replace __raw_i915_read32() with I915_READ_FW() in the workaround for
> the SKL+ scanline counter hardware fail. The two are the same thing
> but everyone else uses I915_READ_FW() so let's follow suit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 70214e1fcd10..3c2109b4be2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct
> intel_crtc *crtc)
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> udelay(1);
> - temp = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv,
> PIPEDSL(pipe)) &
> - DSL_LINEMASK_GEN3;
> + temp = I915_READ_FW(PIPEDSL(pipe)) &
> DSL_LINEMASK_GEN3;
> if (temp != position) {
> position = temp;
> break;
--
Mika Kahola - Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
