On 06/03/2017 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:03:21PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
It is called from either the process or timer context so it is
correct to always disable interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
All 3 look ok to me, I was uncertain about the timer context allowing
just a spin_lock_irq, but if lockdep is happy I was overly conservation.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, I've spotted those while starting to catch up with the some of
the changes that landed while I wasn't 100% present.
Timers are softirq and lockdep is happy.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
