On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:11:47PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:03:21PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > It is called from either the process or timer context so it is > > correct to always disable interrupts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > All 3 look ok to me, I was uncertain about the timer context allowing > just a spin_lock_irq, but if lockdep is happy I was overly conservation. *conversative. Some days I just dispair over what my fingers type. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx