On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:31:23 +0200
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is pretty natural continuation to what Hans started. We haven't
> made use of the drm_panel framework much at all, and there's no need in
> sight, really. It was good for ensuring a certain amount of separation
> between the core and the VBT stuff. Let's keep things that way, but
> without the interface.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
This all looks good to me also, so with the update to patch 5
Reviewed-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Jani Nikula (7):
> drm/i915/dsi: remove support for more than one panel driver
> drm/i915/dsi: call vbt_panel_get_modes directly instead of via
> drm_panel
> drm/i915/dsi: stop using the drm_panel framework completely
> drm/i915/dsi: rename intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence to
> intel_dsi_vbt_exec_sequence
> drm/i915/dsi: rename intel_dsi_pre_disable to intel_dsi_disable
> drm/i915/dsi: rename intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c to intel_dsi_vbt.c
> drm/i915/dsi: arrange intel_dsi.h according to relevant files
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 76 ++++++++--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h | 14 ++--
> .../{intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c => intel_dsi_vbt.c} | 46 +++----------
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c => intel_dsi_vbt.c} (95%)
>
--
--
Bob Paauwe
Bob.J.Paauwe@xxxxxxxxx
IOTG / PED Software Organization
Intel Corp. Folsom, CA
(916) 356-6193
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
