On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:35:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:17:49PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> This reverts commit 233ce881dd91fb13eb6b09deefae33168e6ead4c. > >> > >> I assumed it's ok, but really should have double-checked - CI caught > >> tons of fail :( > > Considering the velocity of drm-tip, I think any CI results for patches > have a rather limited best before date. The patch should've been resent > and gone through testing again before merging. Well the original patch also failed in the CI report, so the issue is known even without resubmit. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
