On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:05:55PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> Let intel_guc_fetch_fw() focus on determining and fetching the correct
> firmware.
>
> This patch introduces intel_sanitize_uc_params() that is called from
> intel_sanitize_options().
Function name mentioned here does not match function in the patch.
Also, can we use "options" to match parent function name?
>
> Then, if we have GuC, we can call intel_guc_fetch_fw() conditionally and
> we do not have to do the internal checks.
>
> v2: fix comment, notify when nuking GuC explicitly enabled (M. Wajdeczko)
>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 16 +---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 45fae97..687f7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -993,6 +993,8 @@ static void intel_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> i915.semaphores = intel_sanitize_semaphores(dev_priv, i915.semaphores);
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("use GPU sempahores? %s\n", yesno(i915.semaphores));
> +
> + intel_uc_sanitize_params(dev_priv);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> index 110dfd1..e74c127 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ int intel_guc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
>
> /**
> - * intel_guc_fetch_fw() - define parameters and fetch firmware
> + * intel_guc_fetch_fw() - determine and fetch firmware
> * @guc: intel_guc struct
> *
> * Called early during driver load, but after GEM is initialised.
> @@ -601,17 +601,6 @@ void intel_guc_fetch_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
> const char *fw_path;
>
> - if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)) {
> - i915.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> - i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> - } else {
> - /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> - if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> - i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv);
> - if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> - i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv);
> - }
> -
> if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)) {
> fw_path = NULL;
> } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -634,9 +623,6 @@ void intel_guc_fetch_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
> guc->fw.fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
> guc->fw.load_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
>
> - /* Early (and silent) return if GuC loading is disabled */
> - if (!i915.enable_guc_loading)
> - return;
> if (fw_path == NULL)
> return;
> if (*fw_path == '\0')
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index d2d2b6c..ef9dc72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,27 @@
> static void uc_fetch_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw);
>
> +void intel_uc_sanitize_params(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)) {
> + if (i915.enable_guc_loading > 0)
> + DRM_INFO("Disabling GuC, no hardware");
Hmm, I'm not sure you can disable something that does not exist...
Maybe message should be like this "Ignoring GuC options (no hardware)"
> +
> + i915.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> + i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> + } else {
> + /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> + if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> + i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv);
> + if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> + i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv);
> + }
> +
> + /* can't enable guc submission without guc loaded */
> + if (!i915.enable_guc_loading)
> + i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
This extra condition should be moved into "else" above.
> +}
> +
> void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->guc.send_mutex);
> @@ -36,8 +57,12 @@ void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> void intel_fetch_uc_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> + if (!i915.enable_guc_loading)
> + return;
> +
> dev_priv->huc.fw.fetch = uc_fetch_fw;
> - intel_huc_fetch_fw(&dev_priv->huc);
> + if (HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
> + intel_huc_fetch_fw(&dev_priv->huc);
I'm not sure how it goes after this series, but previously HAS_HUC check
was done inside huc_fetch_fw() function...
-Michal
>
> dev_priv->guc.fw.fetch = uc_fetch_fw;
> intel_guc_fetch_fw(&dev_priv->guc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index c390663..36653f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ struct intel_huc {
> };
>
> /* intel_uc.c */
> +void intel_uc_sanitize_params(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_fetch_uc_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int intel_guc_send(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len);
> --
> 2.9.3
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
