On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:46:16 +0100, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:21:08PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:15:50 +0100, > > ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Simply doing 'xset dpms force off' while playback is active seems > > > sufficient to anger lockdep [1]. And it's of course correct that it's > > > not safe to use regular spin_lock() outside the irq handler when > > > the irq handler also wants to acquire the same lock. I believe the > > > trigger callback can get called from both irq and non-irq context, > > > so we need to to use spin_lock_irqsave() & co. here. > > > > No, it's just because I used snd_pcm_stop() wrongly. A proper fix > > patch is already in the queue I'm going to submit right now: > > [PATCH 2/8] ALSA: x86: Use snd_pcm_stop_xrun() for connection / > > disconnection paths > > OK, cool. I'll have to try this again once I see that land somewhere. FYI, I merged the branch now to for-next, so it should be included in linux-next tomorrow. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
