On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 6 February 2017 at 17:59, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:39:28AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: >>> This initial series implements 4 ringbuffers to give sufficient coverage for the >>> range of priority levels requested by the GLES and compute extensions. The >>> targeted ringbuffer is specified in the command submission flags. The default >>> ring is 0 (lowest priority). >> >> Link to userspace part that implements these extensions? Also which >> gles/compute extensions are you talking about? Asking not just because of >> the open source userspace requirement, but also because we want to >> upstream a scheduler on the i915 side. Getting alignment on that across >> drm drivers would be sweet. > > Assuming he meant EGL rather than GLES, this is the usual one: > https://www.khronos.org/registry/EGL/extensions/IMG/EGL_IMG_context_priority.txt > There was an RFC for this from Chris.. not sure if it landed yet, but that is what I was planning to use from the userspace side. Probably first step would be to enable this without preemption points. Although I think I have a reasonable idea how the preemption points work.. BR, -R _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
