On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 10:12 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Jani Nikula > > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> This and all the remaining patches on this series (6,7,8 and 9) got > >>> merged to dinq. > >> > >> Given that this patch series was not properly sent as a thread, I don't > >> think our CI ran it as a whole, and it should not have been pushed > >> before that. > > > > I assumed " ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for enable psr2 for > > idle_screen on y-cordinate panel" > > was enough, giving the patches haven't drastically changed after. > > The idea is to test the code that gets pushed... Yep, this makes sense, although I'm sure that BAT doesn't test any of the code touched... But this is another problem. Anyway, that won't happen again. But question: should it be resent to mailing list or try-bot is fine? > > BR, > Jani. > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
