Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: link status property and DP link training failure handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 14:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 05:47:56AM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 16:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:29:05PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > >> The two remaining patches from [1], rebased.
> > > >> 
> > > >> BR,
> > > >> Jani.
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> [1] http://mid.mail-archive.com/1480984058-552-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > Just for the record, I think the only thing missing here is the Xorg
> > > > review on the -modesetting patch. As soon as we have that I can vacuum
> > > > this up (probably best through drm-misc, but not sure).
> > > 
> > > Yeah I rebased this (and provided a debug hack privately) so Martin can
> > > test the modesetting changes.
> > > 
> > > BR,
> > > Jani.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > I tested the -modesetting patch, which Martin had provided to Manasi,
> > with a compliance testing device (DPR-120) that can simulate link
> > training failure. The link rate correctly lowered after the link_status
> > property was set to BAD by the kernel and the userspace responded with a
> > modeset. 
> > 
> > One thing that was not straight forward to figure out was I had to boot
> > with i915.nuclear_pageflip=1. Is it documented somewhere that the
> > property needs DRIVER_ATOMIC to be set, or is it implicit?
> 
> It should work without DRIVER_ATOMIC. At least the property should be
> exposed ... If this does only work with DRIVER_ATOMIC set then we have a
> bug somewhere. Can you pls try to figure out why it doesn't work?
> 

The property is exposed even without DRIVER_ATOMIC set, but the value is
always GOOD (0).
We set connector->state->link_status to BAD when link training fails but
the getconnector() ioctl ends up reading obj->properties->values[i] if
DRIVER_ATOMIC is NOT set. But with DRIVER_ATOMIC set, getconnector()
calls into drm_atomic_connector_get_property() and retrieves the value
stored in connector->state->link_status.


> > The other thing I had trouble with -modesetting was, there was no
> > modeset following a long pulse from the sink at the begging of the test.
> > I had to force a modeset by changing the resolution so that the link
> > training path is executed. However, the link training failure induced a
> > modeset without any intervention.
> 
> Sounds roughly like how it's supposed to work. For real mode configuration
> changes the desktop environment is supposed to set the mode it wants, by
> listening to the xrandr hotplug event. That's not the same as the udev
> hotplug event. You can listen for the xrandr hotplug event using
> 
> $ xev -event randr
> 

Got it, -modesetting does indeed send out the hotplug events upon
hotplug.

-DK


> Cheers, Daniel
> 
> > 
> > -DK
> > 
> > 
> > > > -Daniel
> > > >
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Manasi Navare (2):
> > > >>   drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status
> > > >>   drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure
> > > >> 
> > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c                  | 16 +++++++++
> > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c           | 15 ++++++++
> > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c               | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c               | 27 ++++++++++++++
> > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 22 ++++++++++--
> > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h              |  3 ++
> > > >>  include/drm/drm_connector.h                   | 19 ++++++++++
> > > >>  include/drm/drm_mode_config.h                 |  5 +++
> > > >>  include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h                   |  4 +++
> > > >>  9 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >> 
> > > >> -- 
> > > >> 2.1.4
> > > >> 
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> dri-devel mailing list
> > > >> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > > 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux