Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: link status property and DP link training failure handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:15:40PM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 14:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 05:47:56AM +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 16:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:29:05PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > >> The two remaining patches from [1], rebased.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> BR,
> > > > >> Jani.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> [1] http://mid.mail-archive.com/1480984058-552-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > Just for the record, I think the only thing missing here is the Xorg
> > > > > review on the -modesetting patch. As soon as we have that I can vacuum
> > > > > this up (probably best through drm-misc, but not sure).
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah I rebased this (and provided a debug hack privately) so Martin can
> > > > test the modesetting changes.
> > > > 
> > > > BR,
> > > > Jani.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I tested the -modesetting patch, which Martin had provided to Manasi,
> > > with a compliance testing device (DPR-120) that can simulate link
> > > training failure. The link rate correctly lowered after the link_status
> > > property was set to BAD by the kernel and the userspace responded with a
> > > modeset. 
> > > 
> > > One thing that was not straight forward to figure out was I had to boot
> > > with i915.nuclear_pageflip=1. Is it documented somewhere that the
> > > property needs DRIVER_ATOMIC to be set, or is it implicit?
> > 
> > It should work without DRIVER_ATOMIC. At least the property should be
> > exposed ... If this does only work with DRIVER_ATOMIC set then we have a
> > bug somewhere. Can you pls try to figure out why it doesn't work?
> > 
> 
> The property is exposed even without DRIVER_ATOMIC set, but the value is
> always GOOD (0).
> We set connector->state->link_status to BAD when link training fails but
> the getconnector() ioctl ends up reading obj->properties->values[i] if
> DRIVER_ATOMIC is NOT set. But with DRIVER_ATOMIC set, getconnector()
> calls into drm_atomic_connector_get_property() and retrieves the value
> stored in connector->state->link_status.

That sounds like a bug in the getconnector code. This needs the same
treatment as other places, see e.g.

commit d3a46183db97536a53df5de6b556bd61197842b2
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Jun 8 14:19:15 2016 +0200

    drm: Replace fb_helper->atomic with mode_config->atomic_commit

I think it'd be good to extract this check into a
drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset to better self-document the code, roll it out
to all existing places that check for atomic_commit and then also roll it
out to the getproperty functions (for connectors, planes and crtcs).

> > > The other thing I had trouble with -modesetting was, there was no
> > > modeset following a long pulse from the sink at the begging of the test.
> > > I had to force a modeset by changing the resolution so that the link
> > > training path is executed. However, the link training failure induced a
> > > modeset without any intervention.
> > 
> > Sounds roughly like how it's supposed to work. For real mode configuration
> > changes the desktop environment is supposed to set the mode it wants, by
> > listening to the xrandr hotplug event. That's not the same as the udev
> > hotplug event. You can listen for the xrandr hotplug event using
> > 
> > $ xev -event randr
> > 
> 
> Got it, -modesetting does indeed send out the hotplug events upon
> hotplug.

Excellent, so at least that's all working well.
-Daniel

> 
> -DK
> 
> 
> > Cheers, Daniel
> > 
> > > 
> > > -DK
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > -Daniel
> > > > >
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Manasi Navare (2):
> > > > >>   drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status
> > > > >>   drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c                  | 16 +++++++++
> > > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c           | 15 ++++++++
> > > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c               | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c               | 27 ++++++++++++++
> > > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 22 ++++++++++--
> > > > >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h              |  3 ++
> > > > >>  include/drm/drm_connector.h                   | 19 ++++++++++
> > > > >>  include/drm/drm_mode_config.h                 |  5 +++
> > > > >>  include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h                   |  4 +++
> > > > >>  9 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> -- 
> > > > >> 2.1.4
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> dri-devel mailing list
> > > > >> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux