On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:35:08PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > My little fix for populating intel_state->cdclk with > dev_priv->atomic_cdclk_freq became a little meatier after I realized > that we really need to protect it with what is essentially a crtc > rwlock. That is, writers need to hold all the crtc locks, whereas > readers need to hold at least one. > > Ville Syrjälä (3): > drm/i915: Fix cdclk vs. dev_cdclk mess when not recomputing things > drm/i915: Protect dev_priv->atomic_cdclk_freq with all the crtc locks > drm/i915: Simplify error handling in intel_modeset_all_pipes() Entire series pushed to dinq. Thanks for the reviews. > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 +++++- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
