On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:53:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37:26AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:58:22PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > kerneldoc expects the comment next to definitions, otherwise it can't
> > > pick up exported vs. internal stuff.
> > >
> > > This fixes a warning from the doc build done with:
> > >
> > > $ make DOCBOOKS="" htmldocs
> > >
> > > Fixes: d8187177b0b1 ("drm: add helper for printing to log or seq_file")
> > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Oh well, I liked the practice of having interface descriptions in the
> > headers. If they are in the body, I may as well just read the code.
>
> I'm divided. On one hand it makes it more easily readable for users of the
> code&functions. Otoh having it closer might increase the odds that it's
> not forgotten when the semantics change. Personally I just have lots of
> windows open, with both code and rendered docs ...
And merged up to this one, with addressing your feedback re copyright
notices. Somehow there's a nasty conflict with the extraction in patch 8
that I haven't figured out yet, needs more coffee. Thanks for your review.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
