On ke, 2016-10-12 at 14:16 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > If you really care, go ahead and send the patches to make these Bourne > shell compatible, but then do also sign up for testing them on non-bash > shells. The CI won't. I don't think it's worth the trouble, but YMMV. If they're re-written using POSIX sh constructs only, I don't think they need to be tested outside of POSIX sh? That's what standards are for. I also remember FreeBSD guys being all for letting bash dependency go. So there'd be actual gains too. ./scripts/run-tests.sh: Bourne-Again shell script, UTF-8 Unicode text executable ./scripts/who.sh: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/vgem_reload_basic: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/debugfs_emon_crash: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/drv_module_reload_basic: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/ddx_intel_after_fbdev: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/test_rte_check: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/tools_test: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/check_drm_clients: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/sysfs_l3_parity: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/drv_debugfs_reader: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tests/kms_sysfs_edid_timing: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable ./tools/intel_aubdump.in: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable All are easily convertible. So let's do this. Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
