Em Qua, 2016-09-14 às 12:34 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Here's the series with the reviews implemented. There's a new > > patch, > > based on the additional issue spotted by Lyude. > > There's a bunch of cc: stable patches mixed with non cc: stable > patches > in the series. Do the cc: stable fixes work and backport cleanly > without > the the other non cc: stable patches? If not, can you arrange the > series > to not depend on the other patches? Yeah, my bad. I was just pasting the output of "dim fixes" without considering this aspect. I think the best thing is probably to backport everything to stable and hope it works, considering the current complaints we're seeing about screen flickering on SKL. Agree? I suppose I don't need to resend the series just for these new tags. I'll add them when it's time to merge. > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > > > > Thanks for all the reviews, > > Paulo > > > > Paulo Zanoni (9): > > drm/i915: SAGV is not SKL-only, so rename a few things > > drm/i915: introduce intel_has_sagv() > > drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code > > drm/i915/gen9: fix the WaWmMemoryReadLatency implementation > > drm/i915/gen9: minimum scanlines for Y tile is not always 4 > > drm/i915/gen9: fix plane_blocks_per_line on watermarks > > calculations > > drm/i915/gen9: fix the watermark res_blocks value > > drm/i915/gen9: implement missing case for SKL watermarks > > calculation > > drm/i915/gen9: fail the modeset instead of WARNing on unsuported > > config > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 10 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > > ------------ > > 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
