On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > Here's the series with the reviews implemented. There's a new patch, > based on the additional issue spotted by Lyude. There's a bunch of cc: stable patches mixed with non cc: stable patches in the series. Do the cc: stable fixes work and backport cleanly without the the other non cc: stable patches? If not, can you arrange the series to not depend on the other patches? BR, Jani. > > Thanks for all the reviews, > Paulo > > Paulo Zanoni (9): > drm/i915: SAGV is not SKL-only, so rename a few things > drm/i915: introduce intel_has_sagv() > drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code > drm/i915/gen9: fix the WaWmMemoryReadLatency implementation > drm/i915/gen9: minimum scanlines for Y tile is not always 4 > drm/i915/gen9: fix plane_blocks_per_line on watermarks calculations > drm/i915/gen9: fix the watermark res_blocks value > drm/i915/gen9: implement missing case for SKL watermarks calculation > drm/i915/gen9: fail the modeset instead of WARNing on unsuported > config > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 10 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
