On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 08:02:25AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ma, 2016-07-25 at 18:31 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > A few places we use ring when referring to the struct intel_engine_cs. An > > anachronism we are pruning out. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-9-git-send-email-chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > index e155e8dd28ed..7bfce1d5c61b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void i915_gem_object_flush_cpu_write_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *o > > static void > > i915_gem_object_retire__write(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj); > > static void > > -i915_gem_object_retire__read(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int ring); > > +i915_gem_object_retire__read(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int engine); > > I vote for engine_idx variable name, that much I dislike differing > naming in signature and implementation. I think engine_idx is pretty repugnant. I'll wait until you get to "Refactor activity tracking for requests" so you see how this function looks closer to its final form (in this series at least). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
