On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:59:35AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ma, 2016-07-25 at 18:32 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > - ret = i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj); > > + ret = i915_gem_object_unbind(obj); > > + if (ret == 0) > > (!ret) > > Other than that, looks good. I still think ret == 0 expresses the intent of checking for success much more clearly than !ret. I suppose if we used err rather than ret, if (!err) works better. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
