I have a small (half dozen user) setup that I would like to have a multi-master
setup with one on-prem and one externally hosted replica. This seems like a use
case where I can control most of the dangerous cases to test things.
David Lang
On Wed, 21
Apr 2021, Anatoli via Info wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 01:43:32 -0300
From: Anatoli via Info <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAP 3.4.0 released
Ellie,
Thanks for the clarification.
Is there any issue tracking the advance of this feature? If not, should I create
one on github?
Just having enough info on the current state and needed changes could attract
3rd-party contributions and testing. I'd definitely try to test it if I knew the
exact current state, what's missing and what to expect.
Regards,
Anatoli
On 20/4/21 21:24, ellie timoney wrote:
Hi Anatoli,
Ellie, could you please let us, the users, know if the changes needed
to implement master-master replication are included in this release?
If it were clear to me that master-master replication was now safe, I would have listed it as a feature in the release notes. ;)
I'm not directly certain what is or isn't remaining to make this work, but, it's worth observing that even if the right code is now in place, afaik nobody has used it in this way, so I'm not going to tell people they should start relying on it.
If you're willing to experiment on the side, it might work with bugs (which can be fixed once found), or it might not be complete (and such limitations can be addressed once identified). Either way, feedback from actual usage would be very useful!
But for production purposes, I would assume that 3.4 does not support master-master replication, and stick with the traditional replication schemes.
Cheers,
ellie
------------------------------------------
Cyrus: Info
Permalink: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/T752c02e75bc26013-Mb86d801a993b976fcc13e24a
Delivery options: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/subscription
