On 2015-10-18 12:09, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, at 03:25, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> >> On 2015-10-16 15:00, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: >>> --On 16. Oktober 2015 14:56:32 +0200 Per olof Ljungmark >>> <peo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> If the xlist folder flags worked in 2.4, why were they removed >>>> in 2.5? >>> >>> Because XLIST was a hack that was first introduced and then >>> deprecated by Google. Leave it to Microsoft to rely on hacks. >> >> OK, I can understand that. But it is still the way you redirect >> your OL users to have their sent mail etc ending up in the right >> place. >> >> This looks like a show stopper for for us to go to 2.5 then. > > The XLIST command still works fine, and gets the special use flags > (including magic \Inbox for XLIST but not list-return-specialuse) - > the only change is that instead of hard-coding the names for everyone > on the server, you use the specialuse annotation from the RFC to set > which folders have which special-use, allowing users with different > language folders on the same server. > > It does mean that your provisioning system needs to support creating > with a use, like this: > > TAG CREATE INBOX.Trash (USE (\Trash)) > > You could definitely create a case for improving the tooling around > that, and maybe even adding support to the autocreate options. I > think we'd be happy to backport that to 2.5. "create a case" as in enter a Bugzilla request? I wish we could support in development but that would be more than we can master. Thank you and sorry for not getting the point properly... //per ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
