On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, at 03:25, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > On 2015-10-16 15:00, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > > --On 16. Oktober 2015 14:56:32 +0200 Per olof Ljungmark > > <peo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> If the xlist folder flags worked in 2.4, why were they removed in 2.5? > > > > Because XLIST was a hack that was first introduced and then deprecated > > by Google. Leave it to Microsoft to rely on hacks. > > OK, I can understand that. But it is still the way you redirect your OL > users to have their sent mail etc ending up in the right place. > > This looks like a show stopper for for us to go to 2.5 then. The XLIST command still works fine, and gets the special use flags (including magic \Inbox for XLIST but not list-return-specialuse) - the only change is that instead of hard-coding the names for everyone on the server, you use the specialuse annotation from the RFC to set which folders have which special-use, allowing users with different language folders on the same server. It does mean that your provisioning system needs to support creating with a use, like this: TAG CREATE INBOX.Trash (USE (\Trash)) You could definitely create a case for improving the tooling around that, and maybe even adding support to the autocreate options. I think we'd be happy to backport that to 2.5. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana brong@xxxxxxxxxxx ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
