> > I didn't think that the slave was supposed to be setup to accept > incoming mail? > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.cyrus/33805 > > Hello, Hmm I hadn't read that. I was aware that doing it in a high volume scenario was problematic, but was under the impression that an occasional delivery here and there was theoretically possible. Its pretty amazing since I test it manually and I can send to either one or the other and replication happens correctly; however, when the stupid logrotate message gets sent on the slave within seconds of a similar message being sent on the master, things die. People that use replication as a quasi-hot standby server in the case the master goes down/needs maintenance etc, etc, how do you deal with locally generated mails that will eventually get delivered to a cyrus mailbox on the master to which this is the slave? Chris ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
