Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11

[Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Brian,

Thanks for the review! You can find an updated version of the document here:

https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html

The authors discussed, and believe that SSH, L2TP, and GRE do not expose significant new surfaces for transports and applications compared to the existing protocols surveyed. We did, however, add specific text and references to those protocols in the introduction as explanation.

Thanks,

Tommy

On Apr 3, 2020, at 5:10 AM, Brian Haberman via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Reviewer: Brian Haberman
Review result: Ready with Issues

This document is a survey of network security protocols and their interaction
with transport and application protocols. It is clearly written and easy to
read. I have a minor comment on the contents of this draft.

It is not abundantly clear what the criteria was for selecting the subset of
security protocols included in this draft. Some notable omissions include SSH,
L2TP, and GRE. These seem like interesting omissions given their popularity in
a number of deployment scenarios. Not a showstopper in my opinion, but
interesting to note.


_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call