This looks good to me. (or at least look like the least bad). > On Apr 2, 2020, at 11:24 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'Eligibility for the 2020-2021 Nominating Committee' > <draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-00.txt> as Best Current Practice > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-04-30. Exceptionally, comments may > be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > The 2020-2021 Nominating Committee (NomCom) needs to be formed > between IETF 107 and IETF 108, and the issue of eligibility of who > can serve on that NomCom needs clarification. This document provides > a one-time interpretation of the eligibility rules that is required > for the exceptional situation of the cancellation of the in-person > IETF 107 meeting. This document only affects the seating of the > 2020-2021 NomCom, and does not set a precedent for the future. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
