In article <CAC4RtVBjTjOWLMTFvM50DR2piOLQ4jniXTWPunOoMfvdkOzvXw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I read the draft and I support it. > >Thanks, Bob. > >> One nit: Should it say that it updates BCP10? > >I think it should not, but should be its own BCP. I'm enough of an optimist to hope that we don't need a defined process for future global pandemics. And even if we did, the chances that the next pandemic would be sufficiently similar to use the same changes are low. Put it on the calendar for 2122. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
