> I read the draft and I support it. Thanks, Bob. > One nit: Should it say that it updates BCP10? I think it should not, but should be its own BCP. We need a broader effort to update BCP 10, but this is a one-time exception. Publishing it as a BCP is a process formality, but sets no precedent and won't apply after this year's NomCom is seated. I think it would be wrong for it to formally update BCP 10. Barry
