On 03-Apr-20 06:15, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> I read the draft and I support it.
>
> Thanks, Bob.
>
>> One nit: Should it say that it updates BCP10?
>
> I think it should not, but should be its own BCP.
>
> We need a broader effort to update BCP 10, but this is a one-time
> exception. Publishing it as a BCP is a process formality, but sets no
> precedent and won't apply after this year's NomCom is seated. I think
> it would be wrong for it to formally update BCP 10.
Fully agree. And the draft is fine by me.
Brian
