Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I hope that after this week, there will be some good work in wringing
>> out the bumps and making test enviornments available. Also if wg's
>> interim virtual meetings were to use Jabber, more people will gain the
>> needed skillls to guide new comers.
> I will note that this meeting seems to have had enough load to induce
> severe lag and maybe even full-on disconnections. I am regularly in jabber
> and hold a weekly meeting via jabber, but had to frantically engage an
> alternate solution because my normal setup was not getting me all the
> traffic in a timely fashion. (I saw a couple other people comment about
> lag, too, so at least that part is not just me.)
I once saw a 2 minute lag in seeing my comments echo back.
All the traffic showed up for me, eventually.
I think it was during plenary.
I don't know if there was a new TCP session or not, it didn't persist long
enough for me to investigate, but I certainly did notice and was perplexed.
I didn't remember it until reading your comment.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
