Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That ignores one of the reasons for requiring attendance which is to
> better know the IETF and hence to have the context for decisions.
> I would prefer that the requirement to have actually attended three
> meetings is retained.
My proposal from years ago is that the current rules remain as criteria for
*becoming* eligible.
The difference is that the criteria for *remaining* eligible is lowered.
If we can agree to this structure, then we can proceed forward to determine
(separately) what changes we might make to that criteria.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
