Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-foudil-securitytxt-08.txt> (A Method for Web Security Policies) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 11:28:50AM -0500,
 Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 201 lines which said:

> Myself, I find the use a machine parseable file in format ".txt" to
> be counter-intuitive.  Others have said it should be .json, and that
> we should use JOSE to sign.

Strong *no* from me. The entire idea of security.txt was for it to be
simple to *write*, with ordinary tools, and no need to check the
syntax. Otherwise, adoption would probably suffer.

> 2) it is .json, it is machine parseable, and is JOSE signed.

Pointers to software to create JOSE signatures from a JSON file are
welcome.

> I think that foundil-securitytxt should go back to saag for discussion.

I disagree.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux