2019/12/21 午後7:08、Manfredi (US), Albert E <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>のメール:
-----Original Message-----
From: MBONED <mboned-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker
Nits:
Abstract
This document recommends deprecation of the use of Any-Source
Multicast (ASM) for interdomain multicast. It recommends the use of
Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) for interdomain multicast
applications and that hosts and routers in these deployments fully
support SSM.
CMP: Typo? "and that" does not seem sensible.
I think it's grammatically correct. However, perhaps a less tricky way of saying the same thing would be:
"It recommends the use of Source-Specific Multicast (SSM), for interdomain multicast applications, and *it recommends that* hosts and routers, in these deployments, fully support SSM."
In short, "it recommends" applies both to the first point, use of SSM in interdomain, and it applies to the second point too, that hosts and routers fully support SSM.
Thanks
for the quick response.
I
am not sure about its correctness (I was expecting at least a comma before the “and”), but your suggestion above is easier to read, potentially less ambiguous as well. I suggest an update and that the text above is used :-)
I think it’s absolutely fine as is.. it recommends X and Y.
Tim
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
