Le 08/11/2019 à 02:54, Jen Linkova a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 12:40 AM Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On one hand, I fully agree: RFC6275 does not formally update RFC4861:
there is no "Updates:" tag in its front page. In that sense one might
think about requesting an Errata for adding such a tag, in the DMM WG.
Submitted:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5898
I thank you.
Alex
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
