On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 12:40 AM Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On one hand, I fully agree: RFC6275 does not formally update RFC4861: > there is no "Updates:" tag in its front page. In that sense one might > think about requesting an Errata for adding such a tag, in the DMM WG. Submitted: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5898 -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
