The IANA Considerations is one sentence:
This entire document is about IANA considerations.
I agree that the entire document is about IANA considerations; however, I think it would be useful to list the registries that are impacted, and how they are impacted.
Russ
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 12:11 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
> following document: - 'Guidelines and Registration Procedures for Interface
> Types and Tunnel
> Types'
> <draft-thaler-iftype-reg-05.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-11-07. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> The registration and use of interface types ("ifType" values)
> predated the use of IANA Considerations sections and YANG modules,
> and so confusion has arisen about the interface type allocation
> process. Tunnel types were then added later, with the same
> requirements and allocation policy as interface types. This document
> updates RFC 2863, and provides updated guidelines for the definition
> of new interface types and tunnel types, for consideration by those
> who are defining, registering, or evaluating those definitions.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thaler-iftype-reg/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thaler-iftype-reg/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
