Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Has Issues

I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area
Directors.  Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2019-10-10
IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-15
IESG Telechat date: 2019-10-17

Summary: Has Issues


Major Concerns:

The Abstract ans Section 1 say: "This is a non-standard proprietary
extension." I understand that this is not a standards track document, so
the "non-standard" part makes sense.  However, what is the point of
publishing a "proprietary" extension as an RFC.  I would hope that
interoperable implementations is the goal of publication.

In Section 1, the use of "policy-wise" is unclear.  Is this registration
policy or something else?


Minor Concerns:

None.


Nits:

Section 1: s/label(LABEL)/label (LABEL)/
- s/(V-tld);/(V-tld)./

In addition, there are several places in the upper left corner of the
title page:
   Internet        Engineering     Task Force





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux