Hello, At 09:11 AM 10-10-2019, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Guidelines and Registration Procedures for Interface Types and Tunnel Types' <draft-thaler-iftype-reg-05.txt> as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-11-07. Exceptionally, comments may be
RFC 2863 is a Draft Standard which states that it specifies a protocol. draft-thaler-iftype-reg is about guidance for registration requests. The write-up does not explain why the intended status of the document is "Proposed Standard". That is an usual (intended) status when a document is about procedures (e.g. Section 6.1).
Section 6.3.1 states that "A link to some document is required". The requirement is phrased in such a way that it leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Does the person reviewing those (future) requests wish to deal with that?
Regards, S. Moonesamy
