Hi, I do not know of the rationale for not adding the CUNR information for each option, I'd assume that the respective RFC is enough for that. Maybe Carsten or others can shed some light to that. Ciao! On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 06:59:34AM -0400, Scott O. Bradner wrote: > > > > On Sep 27, 2019, at 4:30 AM, mohamed.boucadair@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > >> (that > >> the IANA registry does not include the option categories) and would > >> suggest > >> that section 6.2 specifically refer back to section 5.10 of RFC 7252 and > >> say > >> that it is an extension of the table in the RFC. > > > > [Med] No need to mention this is an "extension" of the table in 7252. The IANA registry is used to maintain the updated table. > > not quite the case - the IANA maintains a list of options - the table includes additional information not maintained by the IANA > (but maybe should be) > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > core mailing list > core@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
