Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 7:45 PM Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/15/19 6:28 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:45 PM John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx
> <mailto:john-ietf@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
>     However, we claim that the basis of what we do is "IETF
>     consensus".  Today, someone who opts out of the IETF list
>     essentially opts out of that consensus process no matter how
>     active they might be in, e.g., particular WGs. 

> I'm not sure on what basis you make that claim, but I don't agree. The
> discussion in the WG is part of the consensus proces.

Yes, but we do distinguish between working group consensus and IETF
consensus, and working group consensus is not sufficient to get a
document published.

Yes, of course, but that doesn't mean that WG members need to separately chime in on the IETF list in support or opposition of a document

-Ekr


Melinda

--
Melinda Shore
melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx

Software longa, hardware brevis


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux