With that fix, Mike's draft looks pretty good to me. Regards Brian On 09-Sep-19 06:57, Michael StJohns wrote: > On 9/8/2019 2:25 PM, RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> With my ISE hat on... >> >>> I also added an "optional deliverable" to cover April fool's RFCs. >> While the ISE in some sense sits under the RSE, I believe that the 4/1 >> RFCs are the responsibility of the ISE, not the RSE. >> >> Operationally, the ISE has always asked the for an opinion on candidate >> documents, but the final decision has been with the ISE. >> >> I don't think you need to include this in the SoW. >> >> Best, >> Adrian > > OOPS! Noted and easy enough to remove. > > Let's see where/if this goes first... > > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list > rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest >
