I believe that the stated policy was that once there was a rolled out
v3, the RFC would indeed be superseded (obsoleted) by a new one.
Short of insisting on sticking with things which experience proved were
mistakes, I do not see what other choice there was / is.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/28/2019 11:44 AM, Kent Watsen wrote:
Julian - Could you please expand on these concerns for those of us who
have not been involved? The "no single spec" one seems especially
concerning.
Having spent some time looking at V3, I can attest that RFC 7991 does
not reflect what `xml2rfc` implements. Many of the deviations are
captured by draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-09. An
rfc7991bis is needed to reflect reality.
Kent
