Hi Rob, On 2019-07-25 03:50, Rob Sayre wrote: > Actually, it's not ok. A bit more information here would be helpful in improving things. > The static interface works a bit better for about 100 messages, but it's > still broken. In which manner is it broken? Regards, Henrik > In the process, I also discovered a few hot-button threads > that I did not know about. > > I'm sort of irritated that I wasn't able to accurately assess the IETF > contributions of *several* DNS folks because someone decided to stop using > a really basic HTML email list archive. > > thanks, > Rob > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:46 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:42 PM Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> Is the "static mode" any better? >>> >> >> It's way better. Could we change it to be the default? >> >> I'm writing from a fairly nice computer with a big screen, but that >> JS-heavy UI just didn't work. >> >> thanks, >> Rob >> >> >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
