> On Aug 7, 2019, at 13:48, Eric Rescorla <ekr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:30 AM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the > >> tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata? > > My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed. > > > > Alissa's note at > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY may > > be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now. > > This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to deploy > it on the rfc-editor website). > > I certainly agree it would be good to deploy it on the rfc-editor web site, but lots of people go to datatracker and tools, so that shouldn't hold up deploying it on the IETF sites. > > -Ekr Great to see this is coming! While I do sometimes go to the rfc-editor website (expired drafts) I mostly work from the datatracker so having it there would be more helpful for me at least. spt
