Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> And yes, it does help if WGs are responsive to errata as well.
> FWIW, I do think when an appropriate WG is available, they should work
> on emptying the errata queue.
> Like bugs, if nobody cares in patching, why would folks care to report?
1) If WG-chairs could change the state themselves that would help.
2) If WG sessions had a number of errata as part of the status slide,
then that would probably help close the loop.
>> But trying to perform statistical analysis on the numbers is likely to
>> appear to tell us things that just aren't so.
> Not much of an analysis, but more of a simple way to spot where there
> might be room for improvement.
Agreed.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
