Re: why is it still mandatary to have Jabber scribing for WG session given Etherpad can allow anyone to post questions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




If we want to keep the Jabber going, could we not set up our own Jabber server? perhaps tied to the datatracker or something 
more ephemeral ? 

( I've lost more than a few jabber accounts in my days, and I did use Hangouts until the googles switched to mutant XMPP.)

(Meetecho is very useful also, just saying). 

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:10 AM Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2019, at 06:34, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019, Linda Dunbar wrote:
>
>> Installing Jabber is not easy. You have to find specific servers to download, and very often you are not really sure which one is legitimate.
>
> You do not need a Jabber client. You can use the WebRTC enabled Meetecho webpage for the session and chat there. It's "the jabber room". It nicely combines the jabber room (the chat window in Meetecho), the video feed and the notes. It works in any modern browser/OS on a desktop OS.

Exactly; you can use MeetEcho to be "on Jabber".

> I haven't used a jabber client to participate in IETF jabber room for 3-5 years now. I only use Meetecho. I've jabber-scribed probably 30 sessions this way.

Same, though not so much scribing as professionals such as you :)

Tim


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux