On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The usual process is for the IETF Chair tell the ADs to address them > > and get the numbers down, and for the rest of us to have a discussion > > with the the Nomcom if neither of those happen. > > I think that we need to do something to allow the work to be more visible to > WG chairs, leaving the ADs to deal with errata where there are no WG, and > then redirect it to an appropriate WG or XYZAREA-WG. > Some of this could be done by directorates too. > > ADs are too valuable, and yet usually don't have the subject matter, > and at this point, authors don't have any ability to act. Most of the time, if the authors reply back that an errata is (in)valid, I am willing to act on it. More input from a WG list is better, of course, but if I'm left to my own devices, I tend to only act on errata related to technologies that I consider myself to already be an expert at. -Ben
