On 06/08/2019 13:48, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 6/8/19 15:20, Stewart Bryant wrote:
Looking for status = reported by Area is a good way of seeing whether
the ADs are processing them:
App = 113
Art = 228
Gen = 13
Int = 75
Ops = 23
Rai = 55
Rtg = 19
Sec = 169
Tsv = 58
I am please to see that RTG is still low (though could be lower!)
considering the work it took to get them down to an acceptable number a
few years back, but some of the other numbers look excessive.
Skimming through some of the errata, some areas seem to have technical
errata in their "Reported" Queue for over 5 years.
Is there an upper bound on how long errata can remain unprocessed, or
how long the queue may grow?
Any plan to, say, limit the amount of time errata can remain unprocessed
to, say, 6 months - 1 year?
How does this play when an AD leaves the role with a full queue of
unprocessed errata?
Thanks!
Cheers,
The usual process is for the IETF Chair tell the ADs to address them and
get the numbers down, and for the rest of us to have a discussion with
the the Nomcom if neither of those happen.
- Stewart
